[Bug 1612] what is the quantification of unbound variables?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1612





------- Additional Comments From jmdyck@ibiblio.org  2005-07-20 21:16 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> 
> Still from all this discussion, it seems to me that we would
> be better off by avoiding the 1 <= i <= n notation entirely.

Yup, you're probably right.

> I believe that would cover all the cases. Did I miss anything?

If we're ignoring the "for all 1 <= j <= m" case of 4.1.5 (which is covered by
Bug 1584 and Bug 1693), then no, I don't think you missed anything. But note
that I'm not the original poster.

Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2005 21:16:03 UTC