W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2005

[Bug 1686] Hard to find the definitions of purely symbolic judgments

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:00:19 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Dv14V-0005Mw-C8@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Additional Comments From fred.zemke@oracle.com  2005-07-19 23:00 -------
Here I'll add what may be the best solution of all:
add an appendix with a master list of all judgments, preferably in
alphabetic order (with the symbolic ones such as <: or =>stat
sorted in some intelligible fashion), and with hot links to 
the definition.  Place a reference to this list in 2.1.2 
"Notations for judgments" for good measure.
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2005 23:00:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:25 UTC