- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:35:22 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1578
simeon@us.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From simeon@us.ibm.com 2005-07-19 21:35 -------
This should be expanded as a clarification of the previous comment.
Here is some proposed wording for the paragraph.
<<
Note that this normalization rule depends on the function signatures, which is
used to obtained the types of the function parameters
(SequenceType1,...SequenceTypen). For user-defined functions, the function
signature can be obtained from the XQuery prolog where the function is declared.
For built-in functions, the signature is given in the F&O document. For
overloaded built-in functions, several signatures may exists, however, because
they all correspond to sequences of atomic values, they all result in the same
normalization.
>>
That wording does not rely on the static environment which avoids the cyclicity
issue.
- Jerome
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2005 21:35:24 UTC