W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2005

[Bug 1624] can type definitions be recursive?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:01:09 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1DuvSv-0002tN-VG@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1624


simeon@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |minor
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From simeon@us.ibm.com  2005-07-19 17:01 -------
I believe this is editorial. We should refer to the rules for this in
XML Schema.
- Jerome
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2005 17:01:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:25 UTC