W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2005

[Bug 1669] New: [FS] editorial: 4.8.2 For expression

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:54:59 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1DtxQp-0008Fn-S0@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1669

           Summary: [FS] editorial: 4.8.2 For expression
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Last Call drafts
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Formal Semantics
        AssignedTo: simeon@us.ibm.com
        ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


4.8.2 For expression

4.8.2 / STA / rule 1 / conclusion
"Type2  quantifier(Type1)"
    There's no definition for this notation.
    Should it be in the syntax for (Formal) Type?

STA / rule 3 / premise 4
"statEnv + varType(VarRef1 => Type0) |- Expr2 => Type2"
    The second arrow should be a bold colon.

"The last rule contains a For expression"
    s/contains/handles/

"The most specific type possible is: element out {element one {}},
element out {element two {}}, element out {element three {}}"
    Huh? Isn't the most specific type (xs:decimal, xs:float, xs:integer)?

"the iteration expression Expr1, is evaluated"
    Delete comma.

DEv / rule 4 / premise 4
"statEnv |- VarRef of var expands to Variable"
    Move this premise up; it's interfering with the ellipsis.

DEv / rule 5 / premise 3
"statEnv |- Item1 matches Type0"
    Move this premise down one line (after the line with premise 4 & 5 )
    so that it can participate in the ellipsis.

DErr
"If any evaluation of the body of the for expression"
"This rule applies to for expressions"
    s/for/For/  or  <code>for</code>
Received on Sunday, 17 July 2005 00:57:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:25 UTC