W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2005

[Bug 1622] New: a union type does not have a base type

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:14:54 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1DtEn0-0008Vo-FJ@wiggum.w3.org>


           Summary: a union type does not have a base type
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Last Call drafts
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows 2000
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Formal Semantics
        AssignedTo: simeon@us.ibm.com
        ReportedBy: fred.zemke@oracle.com
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org

2.4.4 Top level definitions
First para following the rules for formal EBNF, second sentence:
"In the case of a complex type, or a simple type derived by list 
or union, derivation indicates if the type is derived by extension
or restriction from its base type."  But: a union type does not 
have a base type, so the reference to them appears out of place
Received on Friday, 15 July 2005 01:14:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:25 UTC