W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2005

[Bug 1597] New: [FS] editorial: 4.5.1 Value Comparisons

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 23:22:01 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1DtD1l-0001Fj-Kj@wiggum.w3.org>


           Summary: [FS] editorial: 4.5.1 Value Comparisons
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Last Call drafts
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Formal Semantics
        AssignedTo: simeon@us.ibm.com
        ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org

4.5.1 Value Comparisons

    Maybe italicize 'ValueOp' in table headers (as in 4.4 & 4.5.2).

Table +
Norm / rule 1
    Why introduce the symbol 'ValueOp', when the non-terminal 'ValueComp'
    already means exactly that?
    (Personally, I think 'Op' is a better suffix than 'Comp', so I'd
    rather you renamed ValueComp to ValueOp than vice versa. But in any
    case, you only need one symbol.)
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2005 23:22:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:25 UTC