- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 23:01:56 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1531
Summary: [FS] editorial: 2.1.2 Notations for judgments
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Formal Semantics
AssignedTo: simeon@us.ibm.com
ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
2.1.2 Notations for judgments
"A judgment can contain symbols and patterns."
In a judgment such as
Expr1 + Expr2 : Type
is the plus sign a symbol or pattern? Neither, it seems.
Is there a name for what it is?
See my comments on the previous Last Call draft for more.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Apr/0107.html
(comment #015)
"Patterns are written with italicized words."
This strikes me as very odd use of the word "pattern". Do you have a
reference for it?
(This is another leftover from last year, comment #016.)
"By convention, all patterns in the Formal Semantics correspond to grammar
non-terminals"
This is not entirely true. Here are some counter-examples:
AttributeValueContent, ElementContent
Axis
ConstructionMode
Error, dynError, typeError
LocationHints
SequenceOp, ArithOp, UnaryArithOp, ValueOp, GeneralOp
URI-or-#NULL-NAMESPACE
Variable
"If the same pattern occurs twice in a judgment description"
Delete "description" ?
"cannot be both instance of the pattern"
s/be both instance/both be instances/
"We may write not(Judgment) the judgment which holds ..."
Delete "the judgment"? Replace with comma?
"an "object" may take a value ..."
It would be more precise to say:
"a pattern may be instantiated to a value"
"the object Color"
s/object/pattern/
"those set of possible value"
Change to "that set of possible values"
"For instance, the judgment ... which holds, if ..."
Delete "which" and comma.
Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 23:01:58 UTC