W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2005

[Bug 1375] [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.1.1 Grammar Notes (general)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 03:25:56 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1Dr5yW-0000Y6-5x@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1375





------- Additional Comments From scott_boag@us.ibm.com  2005-07-09 03:25 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> A.1.1 Grammar Notes (general)
> 
> "Note"
>     A.1 EBNF says that production comments are normative, but 1 Introduction
>     says that material labeled as "Note" is not normative.

I think that was talking about a formal Note, but in any case, as noted in my
previous comment, I've added the additional "extra-grammatical constraint" and
made specific that gn: notes are not normative, and enclosed the grammar-notes
proper in a Notes section (part of the W3C xml-spec).

> (examples)
>     From A.1.1 to A.2.3, could the examples be put in
>         <div class="exampleInner">
>     The <code> font is 'monospace', and the <body> font is 'sans-serif', which
>     aren't that easy to distinguish when run together inline.

I can't just edit the HTML, since this is going through xml-spec.  I played with
some options, but it's just not worth it to spend a lot of time on it.
Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 03:26:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:25 UTC