W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2005

[Bug 1379] [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.1.1 grammar-note: comments

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:42:02 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1DqLOs-000852-SP@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1379





------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org  2005-07-07 01:42 -------
On the whole, I'm inclined to think we should accept all
or almost all of these editorial suggestions, including moving
the two examples in A.2.3 into the list of examples
in this note.  I'm not sure how to phrase the bit about
comments in constructors.  If it is only a warning that
some of the constructor production have the ws:explicit
constraint, it should say that.

On a related note, at least one reader finds it confusing
that "(:", ":)", CommentContents, and Comment are all
listed as terminal symbols in A.2.1.  I think the production
for Comment should be moved out of the main grammar in
A.1 into a separate section in A.2 in which the rules for 
terminal symbols are defined.  (Some other production
rules should go along with it:  the numeric literals and
the terminal symbol types taken over from XML and 
Namespaces, for example.)
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2005 01:42:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:25 UTC