W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2005

[Bug 1276] "implementation-provided" needs to be defined if used

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:10:34 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1DREPC-0007vD-F5@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Additional Comments From mrys@microsoft.com  2005-04-28 19:10 -------
"implementation-provided" means that the value is provided by the 
implementation. This can be either through an implementation-defined or 
implementation-dependent mechanism and just means that it comes from the 
outside of the scope of the specification. I am not sure that we really need 
to add a definition for this English term. Would "externally-initialized" be 
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:10:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:23 UTC