- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:28:52 +0900
- To: Henry Zongaro <zongaro@ca.ibm.com>, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org, pcotton@microsoft.com, andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com, jim.melton@oracle.com, sca@us.ibm.com
Hello Henry, [I have copied the (co)chairs of the involved groups because I want to look at how to potentially simplify things.] If there is an editorial version of your spec available, I think it would be much more efficient if we could check that, and tell you that we are okay with that (if we are). I think that on both sides, the more issues we can finish off, the better. Getting a pointer to the issues list, and ideally a way to sort the issues list so that it shows all the issues that we submitted together, and those are sorted by categories such as 'not yet replied', 'replied, but no answer yet', 'satisfied', and so on, would also help us a lot. With kind regards, Martin. At 05:06 04/10/16, Henry Zongaro wrote: > >Martin, > > In [1], you submitted the following comment on the Last Call Working >Draft of XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 Serialization on behalf of the I18N >Working Group. > ><< >[21] Section 8: There should be a reference to XSLT to show examples > of use of character maps. >>> > > Thanks to you and the I18N Working Group for this comment, which I'm >handling editorially. > > I have applied the editorial change that you suggested. I would >appreciate if you could check the next public draft of the specification >when it becomes available, and verify that I've correctly applied the >change. > >Thanks, > >Henry >[1] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Feb/0362.html >------------------------------------------------------------------ >Henry Zongaro Xalan development >IBM SWS Toronto Lab T/L 969-6044; Phone +1 905 413-6044 >mailto:zongaro@ca.ibm.com
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 06:50:42 UTC