W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2004

[Serial] I18N WG last call comments (qt-2004Feb0362-04 and qt-2004Feb0362-05)

From: Henry Zongaro <zongaro@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:33:31 -0400
To: duerst@w3.org
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFBE5C6D4F.3BC81B1A-ON85256F2C.006FF006-85256F2C.0070EC72@ca.ibm.com>


     In [1], you submitted the following comments on the Last Call Working 
Draft of XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 Serialization on behalf of the I18N 
Working Group:

[7] Section 3, 'encoding': Here or for each individual output method,
   something should be said about the BOM. We think it should be
   the following:
   - XML/XHTML: UTF-16: required; UTF-8: may be used.
   - HTML/text: UTF-16: recommended; UTF-8: may be used.

[8] Section 3, 'encoding': This should say that for UTF-16,
   endianness implementation-dependent (or implementation-defined)

     Thanks to you and the I18N Working Group for these comments.

     The XSL and XML Query Working Groups discussed the comments, and 
decided to add a byte-order-mark parameter to the Serialization 
specification to control whether a Byte Order Mark is written.  The actual 
byte order used is implementation-dependent.  If the concept of a Byte 
Order Mark does not make sense for the particular encoding selected, the 
byte-order-mark parameter is ignored.

     May I ask you to confirm that this response is acceptable to the 
working group?


Henry [On behalf of the XSL and XML Query Working Groups]
Henry Zongaro      Xalan development
IBM SWS Toronto Lab   T/L 969-6044;  Phone +1 905 413-6044
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2004 20:34:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:22 UTC