W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2004

RE: Casting/constructors should accept the empty sequence

From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 18:33:07 -0700
Message-ID: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C703083A4E@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokmalhotra@alum.mit.edu>, "Don Chamberlin" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

This is satisfactory.

Best regards
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashokmalhotra@alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:44 PM
> To: Don Chamberlin; Michael Rys
> Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Casting/constructors should accept the empty sequence
> 
> Don, Michael:
> We discussed your comments
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-
> comments/2004Mar/0211.html and
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-
> qt-comments/2004Mar/00891.html
> in San Jose and agreed to make the following changes:
> 
> 1. The constructor functions should accept the empty sequence. If the
> empty sequence is passed to a constructor function, the empty sequence
is
> returned.
> 
> 2. The cast syntax allows the type name to specify whether an empty
> sequence is acceptable. If it is, and the expression to be cast is the
> empty sequence, the empty sequence is returned. If the empty sequence
is
> not allowed and the expression to be cast is the empty sequence, a
type
> error is raised.
> 
> Please confirm that this is satisfactory.
> 
> All the best, Ashok
Received on Saturday, 29 May 2004 21:33:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:34 GMT