- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 21:18:57 +0100
- To: jim.melton@acm.org
- Cc: mhk@mhk.me.uk, public-qt-comments@w3.org
> XPath 2.0 will have to get by with only the > fn:unordered() function ;^) It's a shame that XPath1's rather more elegant approach to unordered node sets, the node set type, has been lost and replaced by a less natural type "self-flattening lists" and ad hoc functions that try to emulate the behaviour of the Xpath 1 type. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:19:19 UTC