W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2004

RE: [F&O] IBM-FO-034: How could an element be nameless?

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:03:48 -0800
Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E801A58760@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Don Chamberlin" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

Thank you for your comment.  We discussed this in Cannes and decided to
remove the offending words.

All the best, Ashok 


From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Don Chamberlin
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:57 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: [F&O] IBM-FO-034: How could an element be nameless?


(IBM-FO-034): Section 14.1.3 (fn:namespace-uri): Describes what happens
if the argument is "an element or attribute node that has no QName". How
could an element or attribute node not have a QName? 

--Don Chamberlin
Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 10:04:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:19 UTC