Steve: Thank you for your comment. The WGs discussed your request this morning and agreed to make the change. All the best, Ashok -----Original Message----- From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 6:39 AM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: ORA-FO-175-B: things you can say about precision of the result SECTION 6.2: functions and operators on numerics last sentence before 6.2.1: "The number of digits of precision returned...is implementation-dependent." I think this statement is only necessary when the return type is xs:decimal. If the return type is xs:integer, then there are obviously 0 places precision after the decimal point, and the precision above is limited by the implementation-defined maximum and minimum values for xs:integer. If the return type is xs:float or xs:double, you can say that the operation, and hence the precision of the result, is dictated by the IEEE floating point standard. As for xs:decimal, the precision ought to be implementation-defined rather than implementation-dependent, which leaves the user completely in the dark about the behavior. - Steve B.Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 16:59:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:07 GMT