W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2004

RE: [F&O] IBM-FO-032: Inconsistent function signatures

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:26:07 -0800
Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E8017EA756@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Don Chamberlin" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Fixed in response to an earlier comment.  Thanks!

 

All the best, Ashok 

________________________________

From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Don Chamberlin
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:57 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: [F&O] IBM-FO-032: Inconsistent function signatures

 


(IBM-FO-032): Sections 9.7.3 (op:subtract-dates) and 9.7.4
(op:subtract-times) have "?" occurrence indicators in their signatures
and state that their arguments may be the empty sequence. But the other
op: functions in this section (such as 9.7.13,
op:add-dayTimeDuration-to-time) do not have "?" occurrence indicators
and do not accept empty sequences. What is the reason for this
inconsistency? 

--Don Chamberlin
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 17:26:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:07 GMT