W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2004

[XPath] About fn:last()

From: Fang Yidong <fangyidong@yahoo.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:10:38 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <20040603031038.75087.qmail@web15407.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Cc: massimo@w3.org

As an implementor of XPath 2.0,I found that it's
difficult to determind the size of context sequence in
an efficient way.Fox example, we want to get the last
node of a sequence:
the resulting sequence is very long(e.g. 1,000,000
nodes) and the data is stored in a file,in the worst
case,we'll have to use 1,000,000 IO operations to get
the value of fn:last() and another 1,000,000 IO
operations to iterate to the last node.Note that it is
 difficult to optimize the query if the last predicate
combine fn:last() with other functions(e.g.
'[fn:last() - fn:position() > 10 ]'). 

So although fn:last() has provided a more powerful way
to manipulate xml data,it has also introduced danger
into XPath: Implementors have to choose a worse way to
meet the specification and the implementation is
limited to operate on small xml data.

In fact,fn:last() is frequently used to locate the
last item of a sequence,and other case is rare.So a
better solution is to let fn:last() return a boolean:
true if the current item is the last member of a
sequence,and false if it is not.Now fn:last() function
like an EOF marker of a  file stream: You won't know
the size of a file until you reach the EOF,but you can
elect to count it during the iteration.And now
fn:last() can be used to operate on a xml stream from
the network on the fly: We don't need to wait for the
whole xml stream to get the value of fn:last().

Do You Yahoo!? 
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 00:10:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:19 UTC