W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2004

Re: [Serialization] MS-SER-LC1-001

From: Henry Zongaro <zongaro@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:38:44 -0400
To: mrys@microsoft.com
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF16FDF9EC.0E9E3514-ON85256ED0.00551C34-85256ED0.0055EE17@ca.ibm.com>

Michael,

     In [1], you submitted the following comment on the Last Call Working 
Draft of XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 Serialization:

<<
Section 1 Introduction 
Editorial 

We think it may be better, if the serialization document is kept
separate, so other serialization formats can be added without impacting
the general datamodel document.
>>

     Thank you for this comment.

     The XSL and XML Query Working Groups discussed your comment, and 
agreed that it would be best to specify the serialization process in a 
separate document.  The editorial note will be deleted.

     I am unsure whether any representative of Microsoft, apart from the 
chair of the XML Query WG, was present when this decision was made.  May I 
ask you to confirm that this response is acceptable to you?

Thanks,

Henry [On behalf of the XSL and XML Query Working Groups]
[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Feb/1195.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry Zongaro      Xalan development
IBM SWS Toronto Lab   T/L 969-6044;  Phone +1 905 413-6044
mailto:zongaro@ca.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 11:39:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:34 GMT