Michael, In [1], you submitted the following comment on the Last Call Working Draft of XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 Serialization: << Section 1 Introduction Editorial We think it may be better, if the serialization document is kept separate, so other serialization formats can be added without impacting the general datamodel document. >> Thank you for this comment. The XSL and XML Query Working Groups discussed your comment, and agreed that it would be best to specify the serialization process in a separate document. The editorial note will be deleted. I am unsure whether any representative of Microsoft, apart from the chair of the XML Query WG, was present when this decision was made. May I ask you to confirm that this response is acceptable to you? Thanks, Henry [On behalf of the XSL and XML Query Working Groups] [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Feb/1195.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ Henry Zongaro Xalan development IBM SWS Toronto Lab T/L 969-6044; Phone +1 905 413-6044 mailto:zongaro@ca.ibm.comReceived on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 11:39:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:34 GMT