- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:49:13 -0500
- To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 05:01:28PM -0500, Jonathan Robie wrote: > At 04:47 PM 1/26/2004, Mark Baker wrote: > >URI-escaping should work fine as an encoding, I expect, and I thank the > >WG for making that decision. > > > >But, what now remains absent from the XQuery specification is a > >normative dependency on it as the canonical encoding to be used for > >XQuery documents serialized into URI form. > > > > > We have closed this issue for now; please let us know if this > > > disposition is not satisfactory. > > > >Sorry, it's not. 8-( > > But if we said that URI-escaping is the normative way to escape an XQuery > for a URI, you would be happy? Yes, that's correct. > I'm not promising anything, I'm gather > information... Understood, thanks. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 17:49:45 UTC