- From: Sarah Wilkin <swilkin@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:22:01 -0800
- To: scott_boag@us.ibm.com
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Yes, thank you. On Jan 25, 2004, at 10:50 PM, scott_boag@us.ibm.com wrote: > Hi Sarah. Your last call comment in [1] has been given the ID > qt-2004Jan0340-01. This is the official response from the XQuery and > XSLT > working groups. > > This issue has also been raised by Michael Dyck in [2]. > > The relevant patterns now "pushState(OPERATOR)" when in non-element > content, and "pushState" in the ELEMENT_CONTENT state. Samples to test > for this situation have been added to the regression tests for the test > parser. > > Thank you for raising the comment. I would be grateful if you would > confirm that this provides an adequate resolution. > > -scott > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Jan/ > 0340.html > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Jan/ > 0243.html >
Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 14:28:46 UTC