- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:44:19 -0800
- To: "Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Since none of the constructors allow the generation, one could argue that the data model does not necessarily need this constraint. Although, if you expose a virtual comment over another source, it still may be worthwhile to add the constraint to the data model as well... Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:22 PM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Cc: David Carlisle > Subject: [DM] comment node constraints > > > David Carlisle wrote: > > There is also the issue of whether the DM should disallow a trailing - > > currently it only disallows --. > > This new Last Call comment will ensure that the apparent inconsistency > between the DM and the rules for comment construction in XQuery and XSLT > is resolved. > > /paulc > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk] > > Sent: January 21, 2004 3:51 PM > > To: Paul Cotton > > Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org > > Subject: RE: [Xquery] Comment constructors > > > > > > That addresses my comment on the Xquery constructors thanks. > > There is also the issue of whether the DM should disallow a trailing > - > > currently it only disallows --. > > > > David > > > > > > -- > > http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew >
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:45:24 UTC