[DM] MS-DM-LC2-079

• From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:35:39 -0800
• To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C701C469FF@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Appendix B References	
Editorial	

Shouldn't the XPath 2.0 document be referenced normatively since it is
being used by the new types in section 7?

Received on Monday, 19 January 2004 14:39:31 UTC