RE: [XPath 2.0] XSCH-XPATH-001

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jwrobie@mindspring.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 3:59 PM
> To: Biron,Paul V
> Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org; W3C XML Schema WG
> Subject: Re: [XPath 2.0] XSCH-XPATH-001
> 
> 
> Biron,Paul V wrote:
> 
> > We agree that there are 2 kinds of types...but to make that clear,
> > shouldn't the definition read:
> >
> >         Each type definition is identified either by a Qname
> >         (for a *named type*) or by an   implementation-dependent
> >         type identifier (for an *anonymous type*)...
> >
> I am looking at this document: 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xpath20-20031112
> 
> Here is the definition I see:
> 
> Each named type definition is identified either by a QName 
> (for a named type) or by an implementation-dependent type 
> identifier (for an anonymous type).
> 
> I don't see the difference between what is there and what you 
> suggest. 
> Can you help me understand this?

Yours starts:

	Each ****named**** type definition

We are asking that it be changed to something like:

	Each type definition

that is...remove the word "name".

Sorry for the confusion.

pvb