RE: [XPath 2.0] XSCH-XPATH-001

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jwrobie@mindspring.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 2:52 PM
> To: Lisa Martin
> Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org; W3C XML Schema WG
> Subject: Re: [XPath 2.0] XSCH-XPATH-001
> 
> >   [Definition: *In-scope type definitions.* Each named type 
> definition
> > is identified either by a QName (for a *named type*) or by an 
> > implementation-dependent 
> > <http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#dt-implementation-dependent> type 
> > identifier (for an *anonymous type*). The in-scope type definitions 
> > include the predefined types as described in *2.4.1 
> Predefined Types* 
> > <http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-predefined-types>. ]
> 
> So there are two kinds of types - named types and anonymous types.

We agree that there are 2 kinds of types...but to make that clear, shouldn't the definition read:

	Each type definition is identified either by a Qname
	(for a *named type*) or by an	implementation-dependent
	type identifier (for an *anonymous type*)...

pvb