- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 12:44:21 -0800
- To: "Xan Gregg" <xan.gregg@jmp.com>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Xan: Additional comment. Please review fn:escape-uri carefully. The Schema WG recommended that we align with the Linking spec but we pushed back and argued that our semantics were correct and consistent. But please check. All the best, Ashok -----Original Message----- From: Xan Gregg [mailto:xan.gregg@jmp.com] Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 11:50 AM To: Ashok Malhotra Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: RE: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators Ashok, As part of reviewing the latest F&O draft for the XML Schema WG, I'm trying to track the issues previously raised by XML Schema WG. You provided a very useful unofficial response [1] to all of the comments. Most items had one of the following dispositions: 1. created discussion thread (1.4 strings and URIs, 2.4. Surrogate pairs) 2. created a Data Model issue (DM-LC1-0129, DM-LC1-0130, DM-LC1-0131 in [2]) 3. created an F&O issue (LC1-100, LC1-103, LC1-104, LC1-111 in [3]) 4. described a completed editorial change For the items in #1, I don't see them on any recorded issue list. Is there a different issues list I should be reading, besides [2] and [3]? And has there been any resolution on the items in #2? The issues list just says "Cross-WG discussions are underway" on each of these. Thanks, xan [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Aug/ 0141.html [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/2003/05/xpath-datamodel-issues/ [3] http://www.w3.org/XML/2003/05/xpath-functions-issues/
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2004 15:44:49 UTC