W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > August 2004

RE: ORA-FO-248-C: need to clarify the behavior of union, intersect and except

From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:38:26 -0700
Message-ID: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C703C07EF8@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Cc: <Stephen.Buxton@oracle.com>

I assume you mean the operators. There are no such functions.

Thanks
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashok Malhotra
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 9:24 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Cc: Stephen.Buxton@oracle.com
> Subject: ORA-FO-248-C: need to clarify the behavior of union,
intersect
> and except
> 
> 
> Steve:
> The joint WGs discussed the request you made in
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Feb/0902.html
> and agreed to add clarifying wording for fn:union, fn:intersect and
> fn:except to cover the case where one of the operands is the
> empty sequence.
> 
> I trust this is satisfactory.
> 
> All the best, Ashok
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:38:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:21 UTC