W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2004

Re: [XSLT 2.0] unparsed-text() signature

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:18:35 +0100
Message-ID: <1603146882.20040402221836@jenitennison.com>
To: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org


Hi Mike,

> Ref: qt-2004Feb0127-01
>
> The XSL WG discussed this today and decided that if the first
> argument to the unparsed-text() function is an empty sequence, the
> result should be an empty sequence.
>
> I would be glad if you could confirm that this resolution is OK.

Yep, that's fine by me.

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/

Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 16:20:29 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Oliver Becker: "Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element?"
Previous message: Dimitre Novatchev: "Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element?"
In reply to: Michael Kay: "[XSLT 2.0] unparsed-text() signature"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:08 GMT