- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 23:05:14 +0100
- To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
The XSL WG discussed this proposal today and decided not to accept it. The WG at present is disinclined at this stage of the game to include new features that expand the scope of the language yet further. While the ideas in the proposal are powerful and have a certain appeal, we need to know when to stop. As someone commented, if we extend xsl:analyze-string to be a complete lexical analyser, the next step will be to turn xsl:for-each-group into a complete syntax analyser... So the answer is: sorry; perhaps in version 3. Michael Kay for the XSL WG
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2004 17:07:00 UTC