At 6:25 AM -0700 030921, Ashok Malhotra wrote: >This comment is Section 3.4 of > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jul/0120.html. > >The comment suggests that the term "more specific" (in reference to a >type) should be replaced by "derived". This change would not be correct. > >The term "more specific" is used exactly once, in Section 2.2.3.2 >(Dynamic Evaluation Phase), and repeated in the Glossary. I couldn't find it in the Glossary. Where should I be looking? -- Dave Peterson SGMLWorks!, for IDEAlliance davep@iit.eduReceived on Sunday, 21 September 2003 22:00:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:01 GMT