> The good news is ive added the filter expression support to > my Xpath 1.0 implementation and it works a treat. Ive also > taken the liberty to convert literals and functions which > return strings into node-tests and numbers into abreviated > child::*[n] type step expressions (as is done in > Xpointer) This doesn't sound like XPath to me, perhaps I have misunderstood. Michael KayReceived on Wednesday, 10 September 2003 10:11:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:01 GMT