Michael, could you point me to the grammar where this is allowable in Xpath 2.0 I can see no such derivation: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#doc-StepExpr >> So the above example would become: >> >> "parent::a/(following-sibling::* | preceding-sibling::*)//text()" >> >> Which in my opinion is logically much more concise... >> >> It could be that I am missing something, but I believe your >> proposal is possible in XPath 2.0. > >Correct, this expression is valid in XPath 2.0. >Michael KayReceived on Wednesday, 10 September 2003 07:55:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:01 GMT