- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:20:21 +0200
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc: "Kay, Michael" <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>, Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Kay, Michael wrote: > I didn't accuse you of anything You wrote (replying to my post) "they allowed freedom of speech in his [Shakespeare's] day." which seemed to imply that someone is indeed limiting yours or the author's, but if I misunderstood that, please accept my apologies. > and I didn't say that I thought it > should stay in the spec. Why don't you simply say what you *do* think then? I requested that the sentence be removed from the spec or that the source be added to the spec, and you replied with a post that seemed to try to justify the inclusion of the sentence. > But of course I should have guessed that you > would read my message that way: you clearly weren't in the mood for > humour. Apologies for the flippancy. Apologies accepted. The whole thing was meant to help the authors and editors to reflect the way in which people could receive the wording and the way it might make them feel, nothing more. Feedback such as this could be received in a more constructive way. Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Monday, 8 September 2003 10:22:35 UTC