RE: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema

>Most XQuery queries

What do you mean by "most XQuery queries"?  

I expect that XQueries of documents that are based on user-defined
complex types will make as heavy use of the user-defined complex types
as the referenced schemas do.

> If this is the case, simple-type-only type-assignment
> might be good enough often.

I am not sure how to take this as a "comment" on XQuery.  It appears to
be a fairly subjective statement to me.  Maybe this thread would be
better on www-ql@w3.org.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
> Sent: October 27, 2003 2:40 PM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema
> 
> 
> I have not finished reading the XQuery specs, but
> here is my understanding of XQuery.
> 
>   - Many operators take advantage of simple types
>   - Most XQuery queries do not take advantage of complex types, unless
>     they use ElementTest.
>   - Thus, simple type assignment is often good enough.
> 
> Am I correct?  If this is the case, simple-type-only type-assignment
> might be good enough often.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
>

Received on Monday, 27 October 2003 22:13:43 UTC