W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2003

RE: [F&O] C.5 isnot

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:37:31 -0800
Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E8B6FDC3@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

David:
Thanks for your comments.  See inline.

All the best, Ashok

-----Original Message-----
From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Carlisle
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:04 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: [F&O] C.5 isnot



It isn't clear why body of the Xquery implementation of 
eg:distinct-nodes-stable
does not just use the simple Xpath given on the line above rather than a

for let where construct,
[AM] The F&O taskforce wanted to illustrate two different approaches to
solving the problem.

The current construct uses "isnot" which has been dropped from the
current draft of xquery/xpath.
[AM] Fixed!


David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 28 November 2003 16:37:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:15 UTC