W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2003

Re: [XQuery] Unqualified vs. unprefixed

From: Don Chamberlin <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:17:37 -0800
To: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@walmsley.com>
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org, w3c-query-editors@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD6081692.65C65293-ON88256DE5.0063ED74-88256DE5.0063F80D@us.ibm.com>
Fixed. Thanks!
--Don Chamberlin





"Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@walmsley.com>
Sent by: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
11/21/2003 07:00 AM
 
        To:     <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        [XQuery] Unqualified vs. unprefixed



I think the XQuery language draft means to use "unprefixed" every where it
currently uses "unqualified", namely in the following three sentences:

Section 3.7.1 "Unqualified element names used in a direct element
constructor are implicitly qualified by the default namespace for element
names."

Section 4.5 "If no default element/type namespace is declared, unqualified
names of elements and types are in no namespace."

Section 4.5 "Unqualified attribute names and variable names are in no
namespace."


Thanks,
Priscilla
Received on Friday, 21 November 2003 13:17:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:03 GMT