W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2003

implementation defined and implementation-dependent

From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 15:27:10 +0100
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F049E17CE@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org

There appears to be an inconsistancy between 
the use of implementation-defined and same, without the hyphenation.
I think the functions document uses it without hyphenation, others
are more consistant.

Rather more worryingly, a v.quick count of that string produces:

In serialisation - 9
In data model -2
In functions - 20
In xpath 19
in xslt 50+ 

instances of one or the other.
  Is it really that fluid/up to the implementor.

Regards DaveP.

**** snip here *****


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 
Received on Monday, 19 May 2003 10:27:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:12 UTC