B. Smedberg wrote: > > After further reading, I now understand that the href specified in > result-document is relative to an implementation-defined URI. > And that > the nature of this URI is outside the scope of the XSLT spec. > > However, I still feel that a standardized protocol for (absolute URI) > linking to result-documents would be a significant aid, even if these > links were transformed internally by browser implementations to other > formats. Is there a WG to consider the xslt: URI scheme as a > separate spec? > I don't think this is within the scope of the XSL WG's activity. Although the activity seems worthwhile, I don't think I can offer advice on how it would be best to pursue this: you need to talk to other vendors in the same line of business to see whether there is scope for agreeing a common approach. Michael KayReceived on Friday, 16 May 2003 00:27:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:59 GMT