- From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:58:17 -0400
- To: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
We discussed this comment today. We have decided to consistently use the phrase "local name" and to add a definition of this term that it is equivalent to the "Namespaces in XML" term "local part". In addition we will add a definition of our "namespace URI" term. > In the table at the beginning of 10.2 reference is made to "local names" > when > "local parts" is the term used in Namespaces in XML. Therefore we have agreed to change the second entry in this table to use the term "local name". > In 10.2.1 the term "local-name part" is used when what is intended is > "local > part". It is easy to confuse that with the similarly named local-name() > function. And we agreed to change "local-name parts" to "local names". Please let us know if you are not satisfied with the resolution of this comment. /paulc Chair, XML Query WG Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Svgdeveloper@aol.com > Sent: May 10, 2003 2:53 PM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: [F&O] 10.2 and 10.2.1 > > > In the table at the beginning of 10.2 reference is made to "local names" > when > "local parts" is the term used in Namespaces in XML. > > In 10.2.1 the term "local-name part" is used when what is intended is > "local > part". It is easy to confuse that with the similarly named local-name() > function. Replace "local-name part" to "local names". > > Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 14:58:29 UTC