W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2003

RE: F&O idref function

From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 08:53:01 +0100
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F049E1768@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: ashokma@microsoft.com, public-qt-comments@w3.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashokma@microsoft.com]
> Sent: 10 May 2003 21:15
> To: Priscilla Walmsley; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: F&O idref function
> The argument to fn:idref is a sequence of string (not a list of
> strings).  Each string in the sequence is parsed as if it was 
> lexically
> of type xs:ID.

What if the source document is well formed only?

Is the implication that any attribute of name idref is of type IDREF
in the associated Schema?  
 If so, have you informed the XML WG of this change in semantics?

regards DaveP

*** snip here ***


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 03:53:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:12 UTC