Hi I hope you didn't misunderstand the intention or tone of my post. I just tried to state my POV, but definitely did not intend to sound harsh or offend anyone. Thanks for your understanding, Tobi > I did not ask you to "revise the requirements". > > The feature I request is not a major requirement which would fit into a > requirements doc. It's a minor but useful feature which could be added > to the draft for XSLT 2. I commented on the XSLT 2 draft, as solicited > by you on > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/ : > "Comments on this specification may be sent to public-qt-comments@w3.org;" > > You said > "Although there was no formal deadline for submitting comments" > which indeed is correct. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20req > lists > "* Improve ease of use" > > Fiddling with xml:preserve etc is very tedious, so the feature I request > would make working with XSLT much easier in this regard (getting nicely > laid out code while preserving whitespace etc where necessary). > > If you don't want feedback on missing features, you might want to say so > in the draft. > > <no-offense> > XSLT 2 won't become a language of the people if you refuse to listen to > comments from the community, by +/- telling people who take the time to > read and work with the draft that their needs are irrelevant. > </no-offense> > > Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/Received on Monday, 10 March 2003 10:41:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:58 GMT