XQuery 1.0 - 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 Examples

• From: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
• Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:27:59 EST
• To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
• Message-ID: <1c3.611795d.2b962e0f@aol.com>

For the following examples in 3.2.3 and 3.2.4,

child::text()
text()

the corresponding definition refers to *all* child text nodes of the context 
node.

Isn't it the case that there can only ever be one such text node which is a 
child node of the context node? The term "all", therefore, seems potentially 
misleading.

Andrew Watt

Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 11:28:33 UTC