The cast expression of 3.12.3 and the constructor function of 3.12.5 seem to be essentially duplicating the same functionality. It isn't immediately obvious to me why such duplication should be necessary or appropriate, particularly since the cast expression seems sometimes/always simply to add the words "cast as" before what would otherwise be a constructor function. Is there a compelling reason for the continuing existence of this seeming duplication? Or am I missing something obvious? Andrew WattReceived on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 09:50:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:58 GMT