- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:54:57 +0200
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC: ashokma@microsoft.com
P.S. I wrote: (sorry for quoting myself) > I hope that an initiative like EXSLT will design and specify a > comprehensive library of useful functions for XSLT 2, which can be > implemented natively by XSLT processors (not written in XSLT, but in > the language the processor is written in, eg C++ or Java). ... if the W3C doesn't. If still hope that the W3C will (continue to) design, grow, and specify a comprehensive standard library, required for conformance for all implementations or only for a specific category of implementations (the latter would be acceptable for me). Initiatives like EXSLT then can provide additional facilities, which might be regarded by some as less general or less widely applicable, or which are prototypes of candidates for future versions of XSLT and related languages. Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 10:55:16 UTC