W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2003

RE: XPath Data Model proposal

From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:41:45 -0700
Message-ID: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A058254CD@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Cc: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, "Mike Champion" <mc@xegesis.org>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

The point of Jonathan's message is that you do not need to provide
schema processing for the datamodel.

We rewrote the processing model section of the XPath/XQuery document and
added a diagram, that should make it clearer that schema processing is
only one way to generate the type information in the data model, as long
as your process to generate the data model guarantees the constraints
required by the data model.

Best regards

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Cowan
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:52 AM
> To: Jonathan Robie
> Cc: Norman Walsh; Mike Champion; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
> Jonathan Robie scripsit:
> > To a DTD-only processor, though, the xsi:type attribute will always
> just
> > an attribute, and there's no place to put type information in the
> of
> > a DTD-only processor, since it is just an Infoset.
> You write as if I were requesting an explanation of xpath-datamodel
> section
> 3.6, but I am not; I am requesting a change to it, so that
> processing can provide datatype information by Schema-compatible means
> without demanding Schema processing.
> --
> All Norstrilians knew what laughter was:        John Cowan
> it was "pleasurable corrigible malfunction".
> http://www.reutershealth.com
>         --Cordwainer Smith, _Norstrilia_
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 15:42:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:12 UTC