- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:16:08 -0700
- To: "Kay, Michael" <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
The F&O taskforce discussed this at the meeting on 7/18/2003 and declined to make the change you suggested. All the best, Ashok > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kay, Michael > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:50 AM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: SAG-FO-04: fn:trace() > > > Software AG does not believe that there is any good reason to include > fn:trace() in the core function library. > > We already have diagnostic features in our product that are much more > sophisticated and usable than the proposed fn:trace() function. We do not > have a sensible way of implementing fn:trace() in our product > architecture, > and we believe that as a result of query optimization, the output is > likely > to be unintelligible to most users. > > We see no need for diagnostic capabilities to be standardised. This should > be an area that is left entirely to implementors to add value. > > We recommend that the fn:trace() function should be dropped, or at least > marked as optional. > > Michael Kay > Software AG >
Received on Monday, 21 July 2003 11:16:46 UTC