W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Data Model - Abstract

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:08:00 -0500
To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <87znpzwsxr.fsf@nwalsh.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Svgdeveloper@aol.com was heard to say:
| In the Abstract of the Data Model WD no mention is made XPath 2.0 in the list 
| of specifications which depend on the Data Model.
|
| I suggest that XPath 2.0 be explicitly mentioned in the Abstract, to minimise 
| the impression that XPath 2.0 is the poor relation in the emerging 
| specification documents.

Fixed.

| Also, the specificity of the reference to [XPath] later in the Abstract would 
| benefit by being expressed as [XPath 1.0], there and elsewhere in the 
| specifications.

Good point.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | You cannot step twice into the same river,
XML Standards Architect | for other waters are continually flowing
Web Tech. and Standards | in.--Heraclitus
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+KEaAOyltUcwYWjsRAt5FAJ9Ht+36C0g7Jn6fB/NJ4UArBbmt5wCfTwds
kYOu0TSgw/+O8qqf8fL8xk4=
=FpHG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 13:08:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:23 GMT