-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Svgdeveloper@aol.com was heard to say: | In the Abstract of the Data Model WD no mention is made XPath 2.0 in the list | of specifications which depend on the Data Model. | | I suggest that XPath 2.0 be explicitly mentioned in the Abstract, to minimise | the impression that XPath 2.0 is the poor relation in the emerging | specification documents. Fixed. | Also, the specificity of the reference to [XPath] later in the Abstract would | benefit by being expressed as [XPath 1.0], there and elsewhere in the | specifications. Good point. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | You cannot step twice into the same river, XML Standards Architect | for other waters are continually flowing Web Tech. and Standards | in.--Heraclitus Sun Microsystems, Inc. | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+KEaAOyltUcwYWjsRAt5FAJ9Ht+36C0g7Jn6fB/NJ4UArBbmt5wCfTwds kYOu0TSgw/+O8qqf8fL8xk4= =FpHG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 13:08:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:23 GMT