W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > August 2003

Your comment on the F&O

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 05:02:32 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB0A5ED7D1@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
I'm having trouble figuring out how to respond to your comment below
from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jul/0105.html

Could you please provide some guidance?

> [38] *** 7.3 "For alignment with the [Character Model for the World
Wide
> Web 1.0], applications may choose collations that treat unnormalized
> strings as though they were normalized (that is, that implicitly
normalize
> the strings)."
>      This is somewhat misleading, in that early uniform normalization
>      should avoid having to compare strings that differ only in
> normalization.
>      This should be reworded carefully. Please also point out that
using
>      highest collation strength does not imply string normalization.


All the best, Ashok
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2003 08:02:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:13 UTC