W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > August 2003

RE: Additional comments/clarifications

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:37:51 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB0A3CBE69@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Cc: <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Thank you for your comments!  See comments inline.

All the best, Ashok

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Duerst
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:35 PM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Additional comments/clarifications
> 
> 
> Dear XML Query / XSL WGs,
> 
> Below please find an additional comment and a clarification
> to our last call comments:
> 
> 
> Additional comment to Functions/Operators:
> 
> [170] the gMonthDay-equal, gYearMonth-equal etc. unlike the other
> descriptions of comparison, omit the word 'normalized' from
> the description. That is, they should say 'if the normalized
> value of $operand1 is equal to the normalized value of $operand2'.
> 
> 
[AM] Done!
> 
> Clarification re. Functions/Operators, our comment [96]:
> The formulas for backup are okay for totally ordered datatypes,
> and our understanding is that you currently only have totally
> ordered datatypes. However, Mark Davis pointed out that should
> you currently have partially ordered types, or should you have
> such types in the future, then two of the formulas would have
> to be changed as follows:
> 
>       a le b <==> foo-less-than(a,b) || foo-equal-to(a,b)
>       a ge b <==> foo-less-than(b,a) || foo-equal-to(a,b)
> ]
[AM] Noted.
> 
> Regards,    Martin.
> 
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 11:38:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:13 UTC